dns.nix changed upstream DNS and fixed comments #99
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
Draft
ITD Ticket
Improvement
Logging
Trainee
bugfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
4 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: Skynet/nixos#99
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "main"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Cleaned up some of the comments (grammar/spelling)
Made suggested changes to the choices of upstream DNS servers
Ye dont actually have to pop yer name in it, we can use
git blame
:DComments like this belong in teh commit message
Maybe try something like this?
Looks good, with a few minor changes (basically formatting) I would be happy to accept that.
requested review from @silver
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
changed this line in version 2 of the diff
resolved all threads
added 1 commit
dd122729
- Changes to upstream DNS - using HEANet and Quad9-unfiltered. primaries and secondaries both.Compare with previous version
;
is not valid for commentsSecondly add line spaces between teh different resolvers, a block of text like that is harder to read.
added 1 commit
bbe81fcd
- Fixing the semicolon comment delimiters to octothorpe comment delimiters, and...Compare with previous version
added 1 commit
38e0eada
- Reverting the ";" near the first half of the file that end up in the DNS...Compare with previous version
Formatting updates for readability, removed superfluous comments, clarified details for DNS providers. Should satisfy, I hope!
Should be cleaner to read now.
resolved all threads
added 1 commit
fa3d68d7
- Added comment lines for readabilityCompare with previous version
I think ye added too many lines (and ended up reducing readability), you only needed to add them to
forwarders
.It is now an even bigger block of text which is harder for me to read.
For my sanity could you please take another look at what I suggested (you can see a pre-existing example in
cacheNetworks
), notably how blank lines are used to segment things off.Of the ~50 lines in
forwarders
only 4 are actual code, the rest are comments, that is far too much of an imbalance.If ye want to add a good chunk of text I'd recommend that you make a
dns.md
(alongside thedns.nix
) and put all the extra info in there, keep the actual config relatively clean.I do think diversifying our upstream revolvers is important and adds good value to skynet.
6f1856549a
to729b8742a0
48114f24ba
to9a65a2e980
755f5e3ed1
to9d4a6605d3
9d4a6605d3
to25adce22b9
25adce22b9
to41036466d4
db6dc69f4d
to778fcdaf11
87e4d39db9
to90af7eeb72
255b2395f7
to86e0c091fb
Gonna close this for now, seems some stuff broke in the (partial) migration
Pull request closed